Opportunity ID: 292535
General Information
Document Type: | Grants Notice |
Funding Opportunity Number: | NOIP17AC00260 |
Funding Opportunity Title: | Reese Creek Watershed Enhancement |
Opportunity Category: | Discretionary |
Opportunity Category Explanation: | – |
Funding Instrument Type: | Cooperative Agreement |
Category of Funding Activity: | Science and Technology and other Research and Development |
Category Explanation: | – |
Expected Number of Awards: | 1 |
Assistance Listings: | 15.954 — National Park Service Conservation, Protection, Outreach, and Education |
Cost Sharing or Matching Requirement: | No |
Version: | Synopsis 1 |
Posted Date: | Mar 16, 2017 |
Last Updated Date: | – |
Original Closing Date for Applications: | Mar 30, 2017 |
Current Closing Date for Applications: | Mar 30, 2017 |
Archive Date: | Apr 29, 2017 |
Estimated Total Program Funding: | $42,800 |
Award Ceiling: | $0 |
Award Floor: | $0 |
Eligibility
Eligible Applicants: | Nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status with the IRS, other than institutions of higher education |
Additional Information on Eligibility: | – |
Additional Information
Agency Name: | National Park Service |
Description: | NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE: NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD This announcement is not a request for applications. ABSTRACT Point of Contact Tina Holland, email: tina_holland@nps.gov, phone: 307-344-2082 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The objective of this Agreement is to Yellowstone National Park is the heart of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem The primary goal of this cooperative agreement is to facilitate a project that reduces irrigation water lost to infiltration and evaporation by replacing an open, unlined ditch with a flow metered pipe system. This saved water will be kept in the Reese Creek flow channel, reduce or eliminate dewatering events, and increase water available to benefit native trout, riparian habitat, and an ongoing USDA Forest Service restoration project. Cooperator must be able to assist with project coordination between NPS, USDA Forest Service, state permitting agencies, and private water rights holders. This project may also serve as a case study for education and outreach efforts to highlight public/private conservation successes. Use staffing and funding of the NPS and the Recipient, to accomplish the following goals: 3. Conduct education programs to: 4. Facilitate the transfer of funds, development, planning, and oversight of habitat improvement projects to benefit native fisheries. a. Transfer funds to accomplish specific activities purchase supplies, equipment, services, or data between participants. The primary goal of this cooperative agreement is to complete a project to reduce irrigation water lost to infiltration and evaporation by replacing an open, unlined ditch with a flow-metered pipe system. This saved water will be kept in the Reese Creek flow channel, reduce or eliminate dewatering events, and increase water available to benefit native trout populations and angling opportunities, improve riparian habitat, and benefit an ongoing USDA Forest Service restoration project. Cooperator must be able to assist with project coordination between NPS, USDA Forest Service, state permitting agencies, and private water rights holders. Project elements include: STATEMENT OF WORK A. The Recipient agrees to: This project will be jointly administered between the Recipient and Yellowstone National Park staff. Scope of Work Tasks to be completed by the recipient: B. NPS agrees to: Contribute $123,800 in funding, staff time, and in-kind contributions to the project. C. The Recipient and NPS, jointly, agree to: A. Use staffing and funding of the NPS and the Recipient, to accomplish the following goals: SINGLE-SOURCE JUSTIFICATION NPS did not solicit full and open competition for this award based the following criteria: Unsolicited Proposal – The proposed award is the result of an unsolicited assistance application which represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach which is not the subject of a current or planned contract or assistance award, but which is deemed advantageous to the program objectives; Continuation – The activity to be funded is necessary to the satisfactory completion of, or is a continuation of an activity presently being funded, and for which competition would have a significant adverse effect on the continuity or completion of the activity. Yellowstone National Park staff is currently working on a watershed enhancement project for Unique Qualifications – The applicant is uniquely qualified to perform the activity based upon a variety of demonstrable factors such as location, property ownership, voluntary support capacity, cost-sharing ability, if applicable, technical expertise, or other such unique qualifications; Patrick Byorth leads the Greater Yellowstone Instream Flow Restoration Project, where TU has already helped to execute on-the-ground, collaborative restoration projects that produce tangible results in Greater Yellowstone region (see existing Yellowstone/TU MOA for Grayling Restoration, Appendix XX). Lack of water is the most difficult aspect of stream restoration because it presents challenging policy hurdles that TU’s experienced staff is uniquely qualified to address. Mr. Byorth began investigating Yellowstone cutthroat trout’s response to dewatering in Yellowstone River tributaries for his graduate work in fisheries science, and spent the next 20 years implementing community-based, conservation and restoration projects in the Yellowstone, Madison, Gallatin, and Big Hole river basins to relieve wild and native trout populations from the effects of wide-spread drought and chronic dewatering. Mr. Byorth went to law school precisely to be able to address the broader legal and policy hurdles to implementing ambitious restoration goals. Demonstrated experience and expertise in public/private partnerships TU’s Montana Water and Habitat Project has been developing and exercising public and private partnerships for 20 years. TU was instrumental in creating the Blackfoot Challenge in partnership with the Big Blackfoot Chapter of TU. On the Big Hole river, Patrick Byorth, as FWP’s Arctic grayling biologist, helped to create the Big Hole Watershed Committee, another successful collaborative watershed group which has taken the lead in watershed conservation. Pat is a stakeholder in the Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum. Megan Casey, TU Staff Attorney, is project manager for the Upper Clark Fork currently working with the Watershed Restoration Coalition and Granite Headwaters watershed groups. Knowledge of Water Rights For twenty years, TU’s Montana Water Project attorneys have crafted reforms in Montana water law and secured legal protections for instream flows. Having led the legislative movement to authorize instream flow leasing, TU holds leases in 32 streams across the state, each of which required several permits and navigating administrative processes before the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation. TU attorneys have led cases before the Montana Water Court and appeared as plaintiffs and lead attorneys before the Montana Supreme Court in paradigmatic cases such as Bean Lake III, 311 Mont. 327 (establishing instream flow and in lake water as beneficial uses), Montana Trout Unlimited v. DNRC,2006 MT 72 (forcing the state to integrate management of surface and ground water), Beaverhead Water v. Montana TU, 2011 MT 151 (establishing standing for non-water right owners in Montana’s statewide adjudication). TU attorneys have also published academic analyses of water law issues, including: L. Zeimer, S. Bradshaw, and M. Casey, Changing Changes; a Road map for Montana’s Water Management, 14 Denver Water L. Rev. 47 (2010), and P. A. Byorth, Conflict to Compact: Federal Reserved Water Rights, Instream Flows, and Native Fish Conservation on National Forests in Montana, 30 Public Land and Res. L. Rev. 35 (2009). Successfully Carrying Water Projects to Completion As stated above, TU currently holds water leases on 32 streams across Montana in the Yellowstone, Gallatin, Madison, Upper Clark Fork, and Big Blackfoot watersheds. Each water lease requires patience and persistence to: create relationships with willing water users, conduct due diligence on water rights, research and document historic use, prepare change in use applications, navigate the administrative processes required to protect water rights as instream flow, and raise funds in support of projects. Projects have been funded from a variety of granting sources, such as private foundations (e.g. Turner Foundation, Cross Foundation, Hewlett Foundation, Ishyama Foundation, Cinnabar Foundation) and public funding (e.g. the Columbia Basin Water Transactions Program and Montana Future Fisheries Improvement Program). The time dedicated to successfully complete each of these projects ranges from 1.5 years to 10 years, requiring patience and persistence. Permitting Each streamflow restoration project may require a variety of permits in addition to administrative change in water rights. TU staff has experience across the spectrum of state and federal permitting required for stream restoration. In particular, Patrick Byorth, Director of Montana Water, Trout Unlimited’s Western Water and Habitat Project has a 27 year career in acquiring and administering permitting including reviewing and issuing over 3,000 permits as a Fisheries Biologist for Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks including Natural Streambed and Land Preservation Act (310), Stream Protection Act (124), Private Pond Licensing, Clean Water Act (404 and 318). In addition to administering permits, Pat has personally acquired permits for over 15 habitat restoration projects as both project applicant and advisor. Unsolicited proposal – The proposed award is the result of an unsolicited assistance application which represents a unique or innovative idea, method or approach which is not the subject of a current or planned contract or assistance award, but which is deemed advantageous to the program objectives; Continuation – The activity to be funded is necessary to the satisfactory completion of, or is a continuation of an activity presently being funded, and for which competition would have a significant adverse effect on the continuity or completion of the activity. 2. The Student Conservation Association was also considered as this organization has a great deal of experience staffing restoration projects in park settings. However, they did not have staff with the requisite water permitting and Montana water rights knowledge needed for project success. 3. The Youth Conservation Corps was also considered, but dismissed for the same lack of specific expertise as SCA. For these reasons, Yellowstone National Park staff request a sole source justification to engage in a cooperative agreement with Trout Unlimited, Inc. |
Link to Additional Information: | – |
Grantor Contact Information: | If you have difficulty accessing the full announcement electronically, please contact:
Tina Holland
Agreements Specialist Phone 307-344-2082 Email:tina_holland@nps.gov |
Version History
Version | Modification Description | Updated Date |
---|---|---|